Showing posts with label Blood Atonement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Blood Atonement. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Blood Atonement - Final Comments

One of the silliest of charges relative to the teachings of Brigham Young about Blood Atonement is that it is unbiblical. Have they read the Old Testament? But you say, the Old Testament was done away with by the New Covenant (New Testament) and Christ. All right, let see what the apostle John has to say about it.
If any man see his brother sin a sin which is not unto death, he shall ask, and he shall give him life for them that sin not unto death. There is a sin unto death:

John obviously believes that some sins are worthy of death. How is that different from the teachings of Brigham Young? Unbiblical? Ridiculous.

In a related topic we will next cover the story of the Danites and the various charges regarding them. Stay tuned!

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Blood Atonement Charge

Critics claim that during the administration of Brigham Young apostates were secretly put to death. They claim this is in line with the teachings of LDS leaders at the time that apostasy was the unforgivable sin, and that the only thing an apostate could do to redeem himself was to give his own life, willingly or unwillingly. H/T FairWiki

As outrageous as this claim is, it was a popular charge 150 years ago. The First Presidency responded formally to this preposterous charge in 1889.

Notwithstanding all the stories told about the killing of apostates, no case of this kind has ever occurred, and of course has never been established against the Church we represent. Hundreds of seceders from the Church have continuously resided and now live in this territory, many of whom have amassed considerable wealth, though bitterly opposed to the Mormon faith and people. Even those who made it their business to fabricate the vilest falsehoods, and to render them plausible by culling isolated passages from old sermons without the explanatory context, and have suffered no opportunity to escape them of vilifying and blackening the characters of the people, have remained among those whom they have thus persistently calumniated until the present day, without receiving the slightest personal injury.

We denounce as entirely untrue the allegation which has been made, that our Church favors or believes in the killing of persons who leave the Church or apostatize from its doctrines. We would view a punishment of this character for such an act with the utmost horror; it is abhorrent to us and is in direct opposition to the fundamental principles of our creed.

This illustrates in part the extreme lengths to which our enemies will go to in order to smear the Church. I submit that it is more of a reflection on them, then it is on us. Now I concede that the First Presidency issuing a statement is not proof that it never happened. Proving a negative is always difficult, that is probably why dishonest critics engage in such outrageous charges. Honest critics are never so outrageous. Dishonest ones practice this form of sophistry with regularity.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Blood Atonement

I have been wondering what controversial topic to cover next. Thanks to my buddy Mark, I've decided on Blood Atonement. Stay tuned!

H/T Mark Giles